Thursday, May 2, 2019

Believe not the Con bots

The current Liberal government has been pursuing reasonable policies that seem to be working.

So why do some people think the federal Liberals have done a lousy job? Why on earth would anyone want to go back to the neocons? 

Do they want the kind of economic policy that shrinks the middle class even more and makes billionaires of CEOs.?!

Change takes time. 

The economic divide really took hold with the Reagan/Thatcher philosophy and since then we've been working in a siphon-up rather than trickle-down economy.

The extremely wealthy earn interest on our debts - that is their "work", their contribution. They reinvest not in business ventures that employ people but in machines that replace them or in stock options to bump up the bonus cheques. They enjoy lives of influence and easy privilege while the hardworking person is scared to complain about wages for fear of losing his or her job, defaulting on mortgage or rent, or payments for that big shiny new RAM truck. 

Still, so many hardworking people vote Conservative and continue to support the kind of economics that breaks their backs while cutting their social services and other public benefits. 

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

North Americans still think they're battling a feudal aristocracy and shoot themselves in the foot

Some tycoons (plutocrats) have a vested interest in redirecting the old revolutionary (anti-aristocratic) spirit toward an uninformed fear of all things "socialist". They encourage anti-elitism without letting on that they are the elite. From pro-Enlightenment to anti-Enlightenment.

Plutocrats would like to reduce or eliminate the social safety net so that they, the already super well-off, will have reduced taxes.  

And to be sure, these owners and heads of corporations will not invest their tax savings in new jobs, let alone schools, roads or hospitals. They will play the market, influence politicians, manipulate the media, misinform the public of their objectives, and further automate production

Meanwhile, the state of current tech continues to put wage-based economics on very shaky ground. Ordinary working people are going to find their fortunes reduced the most under a swing to austerity or thinner government resources. 

Government policies - and taxes - have a role to play in protecting people from the plutocrats - the non-elected owners and heads of corporations - who have vested interests in defeating regulations that cost them profits - regulations such as those that protect the environment, consumer safety, pharmaceuticals, worker health, the health care system.

Monday, January 21, 2019

The Primate Reflex

Human beings' minds have evolved along with culture. We have cultural technologies such as language and writing and communications media by means of which we interact. These have changed dramatically through time allowing the size of our societies to grow. These technologies are what allow us to realize our basic human cognitive potential as individuals.

Meanwhile, we have ways of producing and distributing the things we need to live, and every one of these ways requires a certain kind of social structure, a hierarchy of players. Which means, of course, that when technology changes, the social order has to change -- and inevitably there is social backlash and upheaval. For example, with the printing press came the burning of witches. People don't like change, especially people in high places that stand to lose them. They inherit a sense of entitlement that is eroded by social change and they do everything to resist losing it. They tend to demonize the rising opposition.

People used to believe that people were born into their natural place in a natural hierarchy, until of course the merchant class began to make inroads into power, upsetting the landed aristocracy. This was made possible by technological advances in transportation and navigation. Revolutions and attempts at overthrow followed. People don't like change, especially the people whose only sense of security comes from accepting the established order as natural.

The merchant class has now become the ruling class, the elite. But because its spokesmen don't share the tastes and interests or speak in the old ways of the landed aristocracy, they are readily seen and welcomed as overlords because they sound like the average man on the street. Nevertheless, they are the ruling class, and they rule with only their own interests at heart, for the most part.

With changing technology, relations between genders have changed dramatically. Legally, until the early 20th Century, women in western countries were treated as minors, and most of their labour was done in the home. They did not have a significant public voice because they had no significant public presence. Once labour saving devices became available to them in the home and ultimately the pill and other methods of birth control became available, they were able to step into the public sphere and make their voices heard to some extent. Yet it is still a world shaped by a long history of men occupying the only roles in the public sphere and this legacy still significantly informs most commonly held definitions of how things are and how things should be.

At times of social change due to technological revolution, there will be a backlash. The position of men  is being eroded by many things - women's gaining more of a voice in public affairs; changes in technology that have given rise to job loss through automation; a global economy with goods going to a greater diversity of people; rapid modernization (thought of as westernization) of non-western countries, a weakening of the wage earning power of the less well off in western countries.

The backlash is therefore directed at women, immigrants, or in the case of non-western countries, "the western world" where the lasting negative effects of imperialism are conflated with modernization. Things are changing very fast. These of course are nothing to do with the real problems, which are global warming and inequality (unfairness that is known to be unfair and anger inducing, and the corruption that goes with it).

So the smart thing to do would be to see where the current is flowing and do our best to adapt, but no, we're not that smart. We do the opposite. We regress. Even to chest pounding.